?

Log in

No account? Create an account
You've got to be kidding me - Mike's Journal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Mike

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

You've got to be kidding me [Sep. 23rd, 2004|01:41 pm]
Mike
[Current Mood |indescribableindescribable]

House votes to strip Supreme Court's authority in pledge cases

01:31 PM CDT on Thursday, September 23, 2004


Associated Press



WASHINGTON – The House passed legislation Thursday that would prevent the Supreme Court from ruling on whether the words "under God" should be stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance.

In a politically and emotionally charged debate, Democrats said majority Republicans in the chamber were debasing the Constitution in order to force a vote that could hurt Democrats in the election.

Supporters insisted that Congress has always had authority to limit federal court jurisdiction, and the legislation is needed to protect an affirmation of religion that is part of the national heritage.

The bill, which was passed 247-173, would prohibit federal courts, including the Supreme Court, from hearing cases involving the pledge and its recitation and would prevent federal courts from striking the words "under God" from the pledge.

The legislation has little chance of advancing in the Senate this year, but it laid down another marker for politicians seeking to differentiate themselves from their election opponents on the volatile social issues of the day. Other "wedge" issues that have or could come up before the election include gay marriage and flag-burning.

The Supreme Court in June dismissed, on a technicality, a 2002 federal court decision that the religious reference made the pledge unconstitutional.

Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., the author of the amendment on legislation before the House Thursday, said the high court is likely to rule differently if it considers the substance of the case and "if we allow activist judges to start creating law and say that it is wrong to somehow allow schoolchildren to say 'under God' in the pledge."

In such a scenario, Akin said, Congress will have "emasculated the very heart of what America has always been about."



So now if Congress thinks the Supreme Court will rule against something that they (Congress) feels strongly about, they will attempt to pass a law to tell the Court how to rule. This is getting to be too much.

Now that I look into it, this isnt the first time something like this has been attempted.

H.R.3920 Title: To allow Congress to reverse the judgments of the United States Supreme Court
LinkReply